�\pJames N. Willis D*\P �B�  dü©ñÒMbP?_"*+�€%�����1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 x�Arial��&�?'�?(�?)�?M dXX�"dXX�?�?@V General00.00#,##0 #,##0.00#,##0_);\(#,##0\)#,##0_);[Red]\(#,##0\)#,##0.00_);\(#,##0.00\)#,##0.00_);[Red]\(#,##0.00\)"$"#,##0_);\("$"#,##0\)"$"#,##0_);[Red]\("$"#,##0\) "$"#,##0.00_);\("$"#,##0.00\)%""$"#,##0.00_);[Red]\("$"#,##0.00\)0%0.00% 0.00E+00 #\ ?/? #\ ??/?? m/d/yy d\-mmm\-yy d\-mmm mmm\-yy h:mm\ AM/PMh:mm:ss\ AM/PMh:mm h:mm:ss m/d/yy\ h:mm " "@ " "@ " "@ \(General\)GD#,##0" ";\-#,##0" ";\-\-" ";@" "" "@#,##0" "#,##0" "?<#,##0" ";\-#,##0" ";\-\-" ";@" " ##0.0E+0mm:ss@52_("$"* #,##0_);_("$"* \(#,##0\);_("$"* "-"_);_(@_),)_(* #,##0_);_(* \(#,##0\);_(* "-"_);_(@_)=:_("$"* #,##0.00_);_("$"* \(#,##0.00\);_("$"* "-"??_);_(@_)41_(* #,##0.00_);_(* \(#,##0.00\);_(* "-"??_);_(@_) -(C � �C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C  �C *� ��C (� ��C )� ��C '� ��C  � ��C  �C  ��C  �C  �C  (�C  �C 8�C 0��C  ,��C "8��ÁC "8�ÁÁÁC  (��ÁC ##|��ÁC # ,��ÁC # l��ÁC ##|�ÁÁÁC # l��ÁC # l�ÁÁÁC  ��€��€��€��€��€��€�U} �(} �} �  *�l@�@@�:@�A@�)@ ���<��<��� �o� �M� �8� �-� �/��/��M��K��-��/��8��N��B��/��7@�h@�$@�f@�L@�b@�]@�`@�d@<4Table 14 -- Returns of Tax-Exempt Organizations and 6.Employee Plans Examined, and Recommended and =5Average Additional Tax After Examination, by Type of %Examination, Fiscal Year 2000 Item Tax-exempt  Employee organizations [1] plans [1]  =5Number of returns processed in Calendar Year 1999 [2]! 712,928 [r]! 968,083 [3]5 -Number of returns examined by revenue agents  " %  in Fiscal Year 2000: " % Total~ # ½@~ #€!Ç@ CEP [4]~ #ð@~ # Non-CEP~ #ͺ@~ #€!Ç@5-Recommended additional tax after examination ##3+ in Fiscal Year 2000 (thousand dollars):## Total~ #Œ©A~ # 6ñ@CEP [4]~ #€˜Ù@~ #Non-CEP! 312,321 [5]~ # 6ñ@6.Average recommended additional tax per return ##*" in Fiscal Year 2000 (dollars):##CEP [4]~ #ÀKæ@~ #Non-CEP$ 45,521 [5]~ &A·@d'\[1] For the types of returns included, see the list in Table 15, file 00db15eo.xls, and the  'footnotes to that table.b'Z[2] In general, examination activity may be associated with returns filed in the previous H'@calendar year. However, this relationship is only approximate. ^'V[3] The number of returns processed excludes Welfare Benefit Plans and Fringe Benefit Y'QPlans, which had been included in previous years� Data Books. These returns are \'Tprocessed by the Department of Labor and are not subject to examination by IRS. In `'XCalendar Year 1999, 102,770 welfare benefit plans and 257,277 fringe benefit plans were ' processed. ���!�i�"�R�#�c�$�d�%�C�&��'�F@(�b@)�Q@e '][4] CEP (Coordinated Examination Program) covers “a taxpayer, and its effectively controlled N!'Fentities, that warrants application of ‘team examination� procedures.�_"'W[5] Non-CEP recommended additional tax for tax-exempt organizations was significantly `#'Ximpacted by two closures resulting in $250.4 million in recommended additional tax (74.0?$'7percent of the total dollars recommended for the year).%'[r] - Revised.B&':NOTE: Detail may not add to totals because of rounding. ^''VSOURCE: 2000 IRS Data Book, Publication 55b. Also Tax Exempt and Government Entities, M('EExempt Organizations T:EO and Employee Plans T:EP. Revised May 2003.)= ����> ��"