�\pJames N. Willis �1�9 �B�  dü©ñÒMbP?_"*+�€%,����1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 ��Arial1 P�Arial1 x�Arial��&�?'�?(�?)�?M dXX�"dXX�?�?@V General00.00#,##0 #,##0.00#,##0_);\(#,##0\)#,##0_);[Red]\(#,##0\)#,##0.00_);\(#,##0.00\)#,##0.00_);[Red]\(#,##0.00\)"$"#,##0_);\("$"#,##0\)"$"#,##0_);[Red]\("$"#,##0\) "$"#,##0.00_);\("$"#,##0.00\)%""$"#,##0.00_);[Red]\("$"#,##0.00\)0%0.00% 0.00E+00 #\ ?/? #\ ??/?? m/d/yy d\-mmm\-yy d\-mmm mmm\-yy h:mm\ AM/PMh:mm:ss\ AM/PMh:mm h:mm:ss m/d/yy\ h:mmmmmm\ d\,\ yyyy \(General\) " "@96#,##0" ";\-#,##0" ";\-\-" ";@" "IF#,##0" ";\-#,##0" ";\-\-" ";@" "KH#,##0" ";\-#,##0" ";\-\-" ";@" " " "@"Yes";"Yes";"No""True";"True";"False""On";"On";"Off" ##0.0E+0mm:ss@52_("$"* #,##0_);_("$"* \(#,##0\);_("$"* "-"_);_(@_),)_(* #,##0_);_(* \(#,##0\);_(* "-"_);_(@_)=:_("$"* #,##0.00_);_("$"* \(#,##0.00\);_("$"* "-"??_);_(@_)41_(* #,##0.00_);_(* \(#,##0.00\);_(* "-"??_);_(@_) -0C � �C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C � ��C  �C +� ��C )� ��C *� ��C (� ��C  � ��C  �C  �C  �C  (��C  ��C "�C  �C  �C  �C  #�C   �C  #�C  L�C ! L�C  H�C  H�C "8��C  "<��C <ÎÁ�C  (��C  #<��C  l��C  #<��C "8ÎÆ�ÁC  "<�ÁÁÁC <ÎÁÁÁÁC  (��ÁC  #<�ÁÁÁC   ,��ÁC  #<��ÁC  #<��ÁC  (��ÁC  #<�ÁÁÁC "8ÎÆÁC "8�ÁÁC <ÎÁÁÁC  (�ÁC  #<�ÁÁC   ,�ÁC  #<�ÁC  #<�ÁC  (�ÁC  #<�ÁÁC  #<�ÁC  ��€��€��€��€��€��€�U} �} � 1,l@,R@ ,2�,T�,��,8�,(�,��,(� ,�� ,Z� ,X� ,S� ,S�,^�,R�,E�,W�,M�,2�,��,i�,g�,b�,b�,m�,a�,E�,f�,\�,��,��NFTable 17 -- Appeals Workload, by Status and Category, Fiscal Year 2003, Cases pending 6Cases 6Cases Cases pending%%Type of case and category [1]-October 1, 2002 [2]7 received [3]7closed &October 1, 2003 [2,3,4]~ .�?~ 8@~ 8@~ '@/99( Total cases0€ïì@ D�D�:�ø@ D�D�:P¬ô@ D�D�)°“ñ@ D�D�1;;Non-docketed, total [5]2 è@ % ��@<à|ô@ % ��@<p!ñ@ % ��@ÀÔí@ % ��@ Collection due process~ 3€œÐ@~ =@ß@~ =€ÞÙ@~  ÀÙÔ@ Offers in compromise~ 33¿@~ =€vÐ@~ =€JÊ@~  ;Æ@ Innocent spouse~ 3ô¯@~ =ð®@~ =ħ@~  ³@ Penalty appeals~ 3ˆ´@~ =†È@~ =€Ç@~  Óµ@" Coordinated industry cases~ 3’@~ =€‚@~ =à@~  |’@Industry cases~ 3¬@~ =è‚@~ =ˆƒ@~  XŽ@#!Examination/Tax Exempt and 4>>"Government Entities~ 3)Ä@~ =¤È@~ = Â@~  €zÈ@* Other [6]~ 5Æ©@~ ?³@~ ?^²@~ +(©@#1;;$Docketed, total [7]2€¹Á@ %��@@<>Ì@ %��@@<WÌ@ %��@@€JÅ@ %��@@!Collection due process~ 3I@~ =&@=ˆŽ@{V~  €N@!Offers in compromise~ 3~ =@=�?~  @!Innocent spouse~ 3Àe@~ @ s@=0z@�~  m@!Penalty appeals~ 3~ @@=�?~  @"!Coordinated industry cases~ 3M@~ @0@=K@"~  >@!Industry cases~ 3e@~ @À[@=Àk@�P~   a@#!Examination/Tax Exempt and 4>>"Government Entities~ 3€ÒÀ@~ =€SË@=€÷È@�(n ~  €ZÄ@* Other [6]~ 5(@~ ?"@?€J@'~ +"@qAi[1] A case represents a taxpayer with the same type of tax for one or more tax periods. For example, an lAdindividual with income tax returns for Tax Years 2000, 2001, and 2002 is considered one case; but a bAZcorporation with both an income tax return and an employment tax return is considered two  ,@�!,C�",��#,��$,��%,I�&,��',w�(,��),��*,��+,��,,��-,��.,��/,�@0,v@ Aseparate cases.    q!Ai All Appeals cases are classified in one of eight categories based on similarities of case type and case !!!!t"Alcharacteristics. In order to align tracking toward priority programs, beginning in FY 2003, Appeals changed """"q#Aithe way it tracks cases. Whereas in prior years, cases were tracked by source, from now on they will be ####$Atracked by category. $$$$s%Ak[2] Includes only Appeals jurisdiction cases. Excludes 7,218 cases tracked by Appeals, which are in Chief %%%%K&ACCounsel jurisdiction for trial preparation as of October 1, 2003. &&&&|'At[3] Represents the actual number of cases received, plus or minus transfers and adjustments for prior-year receipts.''''i(Aa[4] Computed number of end-of-year cases, pending on October 1, 2003, (column 4), does not equal ((((m)Aebeginning-of-year cases pending on October 1, 2002 (column 1), plus receipts (column 2), less closed ))))l*Adcases (column 3) because of cases that move in and out of Chief Counsel jurisdiction and because of ****`+AXcases that are returned to compliance or withdrawn from Appeals during the fiscal year. ++++w,Ao[5] Comprises protested cases in which the taxpayer has not filed a petition with the United States Tax Court. ,,,,u-Am[6] The “Other� category groups all other low-volume types of work. Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) and ----n.AfCollection Appeals Program (CAP) types of work are examples of work that is grouped in this category. ....r/Aj[7] Comprises protested cases in which the taxpayer has filed a petition with the United States Tax Court.y0AqSOURCE: IRS Data Book, FY 2003, Publication 55b. Also, Appeals, Strategic Planning, Measures Analysis AP:SP:SPMA]>�€� ��]P0?@ ?€ �DÄ¢D6 D@ = x<w.�> ��" �������������������������������